Texas Lawmakers Grapple with Hemp and Marijuana Policy Divide
06/06/2025
Texas stands at a pivotal moment as lawmakers prepare to revisit policies surrounding hemp and marijuana in the upcoming legislative session. The state’s hemp industry, legalized in 2019, has flourished, generating significant economic activity through products like CBD oils and edibles.
However, the legal distinction between hemp and marijuana—both derived from cannabis but differing in THC content—remains a contentious issue. Hemp contains 0.3% or less THC, the psychoactive compound, while marijuana exceeds this threshold, creating a gray area that has sparked debate over regulation, enforcement, and public safety.
Advocates for stricter regulations argue that the proliferation of hemp-derived products, particularly those with intoxicating effects, poses risks. These products, often sold in smoke shops and convenience stores, can mimic the effects of marijuana, raising concerns about underage access and impaired driving. Some lawmakers are pushing for a crackdown, proposing limits on THC potency or an outright ban on certain hemp-derived items. They cite the need to protect public health and prevent the undermining of Texas’ strict marijuana laws, which still classify marijuana possession as a criminal offense in most cases.
On the other hand, hemp industry supporters warn that overly restrictive policies could devastate a burgeoning sector that employs thousands and generates millions in revenue. They argue for clearer regulations that preserve the industry’s economic benefits while addressing safety concerns, such as mandatory lab testing and labeling standards. Meanwhile, a growing chorus of voices is calling for broader marijuana reform, pointing to shifting public opinion and the potential for tax revenue from legal sales, as seen in states like Colorado and California.
As the 2026 legislative session approaches, Texas must balance economic interests, public safety, and evolving societal attitudes. The outcome will shape not only the hemp industry but also the broader conversation around cannabis policy in a state known for its conservative stance. Lawmakers face pressure to find a path that satisfies both traditional values and the demands of a changing landscape.
Reference
However, the legal distinction between hemp and marijuana—both derived from cannabis but differing in THC content—remains a contentious issue. Hemp contains 0.3% or less THC, the psychoactive compound, while marijuana exceeds this threshold, creating a gray area that has sparked debate over regulation, enforcement, and public safety.
Advocates for stricter regulations argue that the proliferation of hemp-derived products, particularly those with intoxicating effects, poses risks. These products, often sold in smoke shops and convenience stores, can mimic the effects of marijuana, raising concerns about underage access and impaired driving. Some lawmakers are pushing for a crackdown, proposing limits on THC potency or an outright ban on certain hemp-derived items. They cite the need to protect public health and prevent the undermining of Texas’ strict marijuana laws, which still classify marijuana possession as a criminal offense in most cases.
On the other hand, hemp industry supporters warn that overly restrictive policies could devastate a burgeoning sector that employs thousands and generates millions in revenue. They argue for clearer regulations that preserve the industry’s economic benefits while addressing safety concerns, such as mandatory lab testing and labeling standards. Meanwhile, a growing chorus of voices is calling for broader marijuana reform, pointing to shifting public opinion and the potential for tax revenue from legal sales, as seen in states like Colorado and California.
As the 2026 legislative session approaches, Texas must balance economic interests, public safety, and evolving societal attitudes. The outcome will shape not only the hemp industry but also the broader conversation around cannabis policy in a state known for its conservative stance. Lawmakers face pressure to find a path that satisfies both traditional values and the demands of a changing landscape.
Reference
